I don’t give a damn ’bout my reputation
You’re living in the past, it’s a new generation
A girl can do what she wants to do
And that’s what I’m gonna do
- Joan Jett and the Blackhearts, “Bad Reputation”
Today, I was planning to write about Railgun one more time. But an unexpected conversation on the train took my thoughts in a different direction, and now I’m itching to get these new words out. So here we go.
For starters, let’s look at the Japanese term “bancho.” You might remember this word from one of the running gags on Minami-ke, in which rumor spread that Minami Haruka was the bancho of her middle school. The subtitles I watched at the time had left “bancho” completely untranslated, but it was easy enough to figure out from context that it meant a bad girl, a gang leader of some kind.
What I didn’t know, though, and what I’ve picked up on just recently, is that the bancho is kind of a time-honored institution. In every school, it’s pretty much expected for one bad egg to rise up from the student body and become the de facto leader of the other delinquent kids. To teachers, delinquency and the bancho are unavoidable evils. But having observed the education system for a while now, I’m not so sure I agree.
I can’t recall any anime I’ve seen where classtime was more than just window dressing for some other story. And with good reason—school in Japan is pretty dull. No matter what teachers want for their kids, the path to college and high employment is designed so that students MUST focus on memorizing facts and regurgitating them for exams. It’s easy to point fingers at Japan for creating a culture of worker bees, but the truth is that compulsory education is like this pretty much everywhere. The school system puts people through the grinder to build obedient, trained citizens for an industrial society.
The problem is that this is no longer what we need. Technology and ideas are moving at such a fast pace that now it’s more important to raise creative, quick-thinking young adults, rather than forcing them to consume information that will be obsolete when they graduate. Unfortunately, we’ve gotten so used to the panopticon controlling twelve years of our lives that we’re not changing quickly enough.
Enter the bancho. It may surprise you to know that the kids who talk to me the most aren’t the good students, but some of my worst. They sleep through class, never do their homework, and they use a pidgin of badly pronounced English words to communicate foul concepts. But the point is, they talk to me, and the skills they practice actually make them more prepared to communicate than the ones who ace tests. In fact, delinquents are fearless, cunning, quick on their feet and able to solve problems efficiently. A bancho has all of these, plus the personal charisma to lead the rest.
Isn’t that what we want? And isn’t the fact that these kids don’t want to be in class a clear sign that we’re doing something wrong?
Of course, I have lessons to run, and sometimes I’d like nothing more than to give these punks a good old-fashioned thrashing. But that doesn’t change the fact that I see a glimmer of potential in them.



May 12, 2010 at 10:28 am
I was a bancho in high school. I wasn’t allowed to participate in our graduation because I beat up a punk 3 days prior.
We both had it coming.
May 12, 2010 at 10:33 am
And look at you now! A true global citizen.
I wish I could say I was something as rough and tough as a bancho. The worst I got was dabbling in the occult when I was thirteen.
May 12, 2010 at 10:35 am
Theories about education is quite a huge topic, especially in view of the recent growth of information. Seeing your perspective on the direction of education as a teacher is really interesting.
The professor/advisor to a service learning course I teach at Berkeley has tried to push something for a while that I hope you find interesting: learning contracts.
https://www.msu.edu/user/coddejos/contract.htm
Theoretically, it’s to avoid forcing students to consume unnecessary information while at the same time motivate them to branch out themselves.
More relevant to banchos. I think above a certain level of education, success is largely based on charisma and social interactions. Especially with increasing competition, that aspect becomes more significant. Banchos really may have the most potential in a classroom (as long as they graduate).
“Of course, I have lessons to run, and sometimes I’d like nothing more than to give these punks a good old-fashioned thrashing.”
Haha, is corporal punishment still legal?
May 12, 2010 at 11:10 am
I’m familiar with learning contracts. I undertook independent study in my last two years, which uses fairly similar principles. But I dig that we’re on the same page, thinking-wise.
Corporal punishment is utterly illegal. You also can’t force kids to leave the class when they’re being disruptive, because it supposedly takes away their constitutional right to an education. In many ways Japanese teachers have it worse than in America, because they really have to walk on eggshells to control an unruly class. But somehow it gets done.
May 12, 2010 at 11:20 am
I thought you would. ^ ^
Does it work with kids though?
May 12, 2010 at 11:23 am
My knee-jerk response is “absolutely not,” because I think at thirteen or fourteen they hardly know what they want to know more about. But I’ve never seen it attempted, so I couldn’t say for sure. It would be grand if it did work!
May 12, 2010 at 10:39 am
Out school doesn’t have anything I could point out as a bancho, but it does have a similar phenomenon. And I’m going to try to phrase this in a way that doesn’t make me sound like a jerk…
A few weeks ago, we were having a very very lax lesson in my AP English class, and instead of actually discussing something relevant to English, we started talking about the different levels of study, and the kids who selected them; we started discussing the “standard kids”.
And we came to these conclusions: Not only are the “standard kids” often quite intelligent, (my best friend is a “standard kid”, and he’s brilliant enough to be in all of the same classes I am–he’s just lazy. A common “standard kid” phenomenon.) but they actually plan the classes they want to take the easy road in and which they do not. Whereas we “AP kids” just glom on to as many challenging courses as we can, without a thought to how much trouble we may have balancing the schedule or actually doing well. And while we may be better off for managing it all in the end, the “standard kids” will remember all the same things we do by the time the next year rolls around (absolutely nothing).
We may be able to analyse a novel or tell you what battle led to the fall of Napoleon, but they’re the ones who’ll have time to work on that big project for a class we may share with them, because they haven’t chosen to swamp themselves. They pick the classes that allow them to be lazy on purpose, because they’re wiser than us. Huhuhu.
And you know, they’ll probably score well on that project. Maybe the teacher will be charmed and hang their posterboard from the wall or something similar. But we AP kids with our half-assed homework assignments will probably end up being forgotten in the end. And that “standard kid” will remain in the teacher’s mind as the kid who was willing to make fun of her, joke with her, and maybe even argue with her in class, while we “AP kids” were busy cramming for a test in the next period.
I’m sorry for such a long comment. o_o;;
And it’s only vaguely related. orz;;
May 12, 2010 at 11:13 am
No need to be sorry! I thought it was a fascinating read, and rather nostalgic too. I think you’ll find that in college, outside of the really exceptionally motivated few, everybody becomes what you would call standard.
… But see, now I feel bad because my reply to your comment is so damnably short.
Thanks for reading.
May 12, 2010 at 7:01 pm
Don’t feel bad! Thanks for writing! o/
May 12, 2010 at 10:40 am
I was always one of the ridiculously well-behaved ones, to the extent where teachers were about 50% ecstatic and 50% suspicious. I don’t know if I regret it; I was afraid of getting in trouble. The one time I did (it was a case of mistaken identity, duh :/), I cried loudly. I think I was about 13. Yeah. That did wonders for my social life.
You make an excellent point. The teen-bancho way of life might just build adults who’ll thrive and succeed when they graduate. And hey, nobody will be able to call them worker-bees! Unfortunately (or fortunately?), you’re one of the brave souls who has to deal with them while they’re growing up. Good luck, you valiant fellow! ^^
May 12, 2010 at 11:20 am
Well-behaved, you say… But surely this means you went absolutely crazy in university. I noticed that among my former classmates, at least.
As the barbarian teacher, I don’t have to subscribe to the Japanese practice of staying at school into the wee hours. It makes my work a bit harder, since I have to cram as much internationalization as I can in a very small window of time… But on the other hand, no matter how awful the day is, at four o’ clock, I pack up, go home and do what I want. It’s rather nice.
Thanks for the encouragement, and for reading, as always.
May 12, 2010 at 1:18 pm
I was some sort of a delinquent too back then and so are my friends. The disciplinary room was our classroom.Turned out that we have the coolest jobs as adults that requires creativity: photographers, editors, musicians. Those who aced it, working 9-5 routinely and take comfort with what they already have. They just stopped thinking out of the box.
I’m glad I picked the right friends despite what the teachers said.
May 13, 2010 at 8:17 am
Ah-ha, so you’re the proof in the pudding, as the say.
Good to know this actually happens. Cheers.
May 12, 2010 at 2:15 pm
Hey, don’t forget another great bancho example: Salaryman Kintaro! In fact the theme of that show is very much in line with what you describe above. The show criticizes salaryman culture as conformist, and lionizes Kintaro as willing to take chances, and taking principled stands. Plus it’s a fun show
May 13, 2010 at 8:17 am
I’ve always heard of Salaryman Kintaro, but never actually watched any. Now that you mention it, though, that’s exactly what I mean. Thanks for pointing that out.
May 12, 2010 at 2:34 pm
I don’t think I became a really good student until college; I got good grades throughout high school, but I didn’t like the whole “cram a bunch of information into your head for six hours and then cram more information for a few hours afterward at home” style of teaching.
Part of it was just me being a lazy bastard, no doubt, but I can count the number of engaging high school classes I had on one hand. College was better for me, because it is so much more free-flowing and feels as if the student has more choice, even though most of the classes on the curriculum are already set in stone, haha.
I can’t say I was a bancho, though. Never quite had the personality for that. I was more the quiet kid who alternated between listening to friends at lunch and reading Catch-22 for fun. xD
May 13, 2010 at 8:17 am
I was much the same. Once I was no longer required to take math or science, I got rather good at my studies. Even for those couple times that I actually DID have to take math or science.
In the Japanese system, there’s a lot of fact-cramming, a lot of rote copying, and sadly not a lot of rhetoric or creative composition. I can’t say the US system is much better, but the fact that we write about our thoughts and feelings on a regular basis must count for something.
Thanks for reading.
May 12, 2010 at 2:37 pm
And then there is the one category of student which fits in an awkward position… the “bad kids” who are at the top of the class (if Haruka was bancho, there we go). I seemed to have fit in this category, seeing as there was a very small set of teachers who could handle me or get me to come to class, but I wasn’t the apex of this. One of my Valedictorian friends was brilliant, but did not care at all for this social conform the school system tries to lay on kids… he spent afternoons skating the school, having run-ins with security, etc … and his close circle was not well-liked by the administration lol.
These types aren’t bad in a sense of bullying, “running delinquents” or having run-ins with higher-ups (we were most definitely in those circles, but we didn’t care, we just liked the loose crowd), but I think more than anything it breaks the distinction between good/bad student and what that means in terms of grades vs social role.
Slightly reminds me of Randall’s character in the movie Dazed and Confused.
May 13, 2010 at 8:17 am
I’ve never seen Dazed and Confused, sadly. But I get what you mean. The trick to the system is fostering the talents of the people who are bad because they’re bored or indifferent. And sometimes people are just bad because they like to do bad things.
May 12, 2010 at 3:30 pm
>But the point is, they talk to me, and the skills they practice actually make them more prepared to communicate than the ones who ace tests.
Ow ow ow ouch. My spoken English is still weak to this day. Guh.
But that was definitely a fascinating tidbit, sensei!
May 13, 2010 at 8:19 am
Really? But you’re so articulate online… Well, I suppose I’m the same in Japanese. I can listen, and to a far lesser extent read, but ask me to write or speak and I’ll flounder.
Thanks for reading.
May 12, 2010 at 4:22 pm
I agree the bancho could be the ideal person: a free-willed individual capable of leading others without being “corrupted” or “selling out”.
Still, in our global, industrial world, society must function as a system. The advancement of industry and technology technology is dependent the “cogs in the wheel”-type personalities that are willing to fit the worker bee role.
In our industrial hive of a world, the “banchos” fit in two places: CEOs and dregs. It’s their pioneering spirit which lends them either the ability to orchestrate the “cogs” into a machine or destroy themselves for being just another broken piece. You see, it isn’t enough to be delinquent, one must be self-aware and audacious in their attempts to manipulate others, for that, after all, is the true power of the bancho.
So while it is possible to see the romantics of being a delinquent, we must remember that the true bancho is a very special breed. You see, they perfect delinquency into a practical art, therefore becoming equally important parts of the world, and incredibly successful illustrations of Capitalism. So, my fellow readers, are you true banchos, or just a really lazy and incompetent cog?
or we can all resort to tribalism and living in communes. Whatever. Sorry for long comment
May 13, 2010 at 8:19 am
Oh, don’t be sorry.
You’ve made a good point. As much as I’d like to believe that every troublesome kid has some unrealized greatness that simply requires another method of learning to come out, sometimes a bad egg is exactly so. I just choose to hope.
May 12, 2010 at 4:34 pm
We studied a bit about the Japanese education system in my Japanese 2B class. One of the things I remember most is how its much more focused on, as you say, learning “useless” facts to regurgitate back on tests rather than expressing one’s own creative opinions and thinking critically. The “smart” students who are able to keep up with all the studying are honored with good grades (though they receive stress and confinement in return), while the students who just can’t keep up and are unable to “be themselves” in the rigid system become bancho to release that pent up anger. Unfortunately this is a potential problem in any school system – you have a bunch of people with different backgrounds and learning levels yet they’re all expected to learn the same things at the same rate.
As someone who’s always been a diligent student with good grades, I can’t say I can relate to the bancho mentality but I definitely understand where it could come from.
May 13, 2010 at 8:19 am
The ironic thing is that the public school system is so well-suited for the way our society functioned before the last decade or two. We’re still producing educated, trained citizens in a way that people centuries ago couldn’t even have dreamed of. But now we’re becoming a victim of our own phenomenal progress.
May 12, 2010 at 5:06 pm
That potential does need to be harnessed though and hopefully these kids find motivation somewhere to direct that creative energy.
One of these days, I’d like to research the Japanese business environment just to see how well one can start up an enterprise and bring it to profitability. If I had to develop a hypothesis, it’s that it’s still more on big businesses rather than startups, which is a shame since it indicates that the creative outlets for bancho are few and far in between.
May 13, 2010 at 8:20 am
I’m guessing you’re right. Whenever the conversation turns to how poor and empty the prefecture is, I notice Japanese people always say the same thing: “It’s because there are no companies here.” But what exactly stops an enterprising young soul from starting their own company, or at least some way to make a living? I’ve heard that things are starting to shift this way, though, so there’s hope.
May 12, 2010 at 8:41 pm
2DT god damn you, thanks to you leaving things so open-ended, you’ve practically forced me to write an epic response post, since I’ve got too much response floating around. Especially since I’ve been reading manga with great examples.
Just a note though.
>Unfortunately, we’ve gotten so used to the panopticon
>panopticon
You are the first person other than myself that I’ve ever seen use the word panopticon in regular speech. I learned the word from an Isis album of the same name, and after researching it, it has long been one of my favorite words. I even ran a really great RPG on a forum called ‘The Panopticon’. I guess I’m just giddy as hell to see the word popping up in the aniblogosphere.
May 13, 2010 at 3:09 am
Oh, and I forgot to mention, I love the use of Bad Reputation as the quote in this post LOLOL
May 13, 2010 at 8:20 am
Really, though, how could I not?
May 13, 2010 at 8:20 am
Great, looking forward to it!
As for “panopticon,” I’m really glad you caught it. I just had to slip in a reference to Michel Foucault somewhere.
May 13, 2010 at 3:50 am
It may be pretty to romanticize the concept of a bancho, but most of them are still not acquiring the knowledge to become healthy members to society. Certainly, they acquire highly applicable skills due to their position, but when you pair that with the antisocial nature of the bancho, you don’t get a winner.
What they need are mentors to provide guidance. But then they wouldn’t bed banchos any more, would they? Good Will Hunting is a good example of someone like this.
May 13, 2010 at 8:23 am
Fortunately, this is the sort of thing many people grow out of.
It’s actually very interesting that you should put it this way, because manhood rituals outside of western society tend to involve children being pushed “outside” of society for a time, being forced to learn vital skills, then being welcomed back as adults. And then hopefully they remember those skills for their adult lives. Well, food for thought.
Thanks for reading. And welcome!
May 13, 2010 at 5:08 am
Unfortunately, I’m the opposite of the bancho. I guess you could call me a goodie-goodie two-shoes that does my homework and does what the teacher asks. I’ll probably become one of those mindless workers, but if that’s where I end up…then that’s where I end up.
I noticed exactly what you had noticed: the “bad” students, if you will, often have friendly relations with the teachers moreso than the best in the class. I don’t know if they’re just trying to suck up to the teacher or are just extremely active, social creatures. It’s actually made me quite jealous, really.
May 13, 2010 at 8:25 am
This is pure speculation, but because the bad kids don’t see the teacher as someone to be feared (they certainly don’t see them as someone to be obeyed), perhaps that gives them the edge.
Nothing wrong with mindless work, as long as you get to do what you want eventually.
Thanks for reading.
May 13, 2010 at 7:27 am
Banchos provide an intriguing situation, and it’s something we see in anime a lot. In many cases, many anime banchos seize their potential and turn it into something productive. My guess is that this certainly happens with some real-life banchos as well, it just the maturity that comes with aging which takes the disruptive energy and channels it somewhere useful.
On a different note, I agree with the need to stress critical thinking in our education. It’s surprising when I how surprised Asian stduents are to see Western students question their teachers and speak up in class voluntarily. It completely contradicts my experience of education, where one was encouraged to question, to defend, and to participate.
I remember a course in high school (a sort of English class) where all I was told to do was take a position and defend it. No memorizing of facts and what not, just watch/read something, get asked an open question, take a position and defend it well using what you watched/read.
It makes sense given something like the Socratic method arose out of Western education, where there isn’t a memorizing and repeating of facts, but something requiring much more of the student. This is why I’m always a bit bothered by standardized test, and the ones that “determine your future” in Asian countries. Everyone has potential and learns differently, but training to answer a bunch of multiple choice questions may not be the best way of bringing that out.
May 13, 2010 at 8:29 am
It’s funny you should say this, because I’m currently studying for the GRE (for non-Americans: it’s a standardized test to be able to pursue a higher degree at American universities). I definitely don’t feel any love for this system.
I don’t want to oversimplify, but I suppose it comes down to the difference between Socrates (well, really Plato) and Confucius: Guided questioning toward the truth versus obedience and the social contract. Interesting train of thought. Cheers.
May 13, 2010 at 9:29 am
So lyk, is there a reason they’re all blond?
May 13, 2010 at 3:09 pm
Probably “yankee” stereotypes being conflated with bancho-ism. Dying your hair while still in school is a pretty bad-ass thing for a kid to do here. Even adults with completely blond hair are seen as pretty wild.
May 13, 2010 at 8:02 pm
[...] system is designed to produce automatons with rote learning of facts rather than fostering creativity and individuality and represents the root of many problems to do with [...]
May 15, 2010 at 7:12 am
Ah, good ol’ Foucault. Good and thoughtful points, although I’d add that the essential conceit of a public education system is the mass provision of what is essentially a personalized good. Schools tend to show a lot of wearing at the seams precisely because everyone learns at different rates, but we try to get kids to stick in one glob at a time for convenience’s sake and to try and benefit from economies of scale.
As for bancho stereotypes in anime itself, this brings to mind the “yakuza princess” stereotypes you brought up a while back in your post on Hanamaru Kindergarten. They’re not quite the same, but there seems to superficial similarities – both for male and female bancho to their yakuza equivalents, and both seem to be a very long-lived institution.
May 15, 2010 at 1:27 pm
Sure, I agree with that. Given the choice of today’s education and the elites-only systems of yesteryear, there’s no question what I prefer. The world population now is impressively learned… But there’s still room to be better, you know?
Nice connection with the yakuza entry! I hadn’t thought of that, but I think this is true. Japan is just as fond of its rebels as we westerners are, I guess.
Thanks for reading.
May 15, 2010 at 11:54 pm
Oh man, now there’s something I can unload my life story on.
Hong Kong, or at least my experiences of middle-school – early high-school HK, is a curious mix of the two, uniform industriousness and sharp, practical thinking.
Students are forced to retain ungodly amounts of information in classes in order to take brutal, months-long cumulative regional exams; however, amidst all this is HK’s dynamic and omnipresent city-culture. I met and interacted with more people and events in a day in HK than I do in a week in North America – probably due to my lack of transport here, but it stands that more people equals more social interaction, which as you have said equates courage and quick problem solving. It is a peoples’ world.
HKers by nature seem to have a degree of guile – yes, guile. It doesn’t seem to stop at clever, and Japan’s politeness certainly isn’t present. This may have roots in our history of self-preservation, but that’s too dark for me to ever want to explore. Combining this with the general apathy present in large cities and you get very street-smart kids who deliver their pragmatic logic with nothing but the sharpest tongues. There was never a delinquent leader; everyone was a bit of a delinquent inside. I remember my class systematically ruining three french teachers’ reputations to the point where they were forced to quit or fired, because we didn’t like them – but that’s a going off on a tangent.
Much of North America interestingly presents the exact opposite; these rural communities possess an education system that tries to enrich a person, give one a scope of the entire world. Never will you hear the words ‘the next civilization will look upon Canada as being generally the same as the United States’ from a teacher in Hong Kong – the fate of our culture was inconsequential, and the study of foreign cultural perception didn’t help us crunch numbers. After my HK experience I’m amazed by the teachers here, and the depth of their knowledge in the most irrelevant of areas. It stands that students here probably won’t ever become as good at carrying a business as students over there wold be, but they are more enriched people, for what it’s worth.
Back to the topic of the bancho – here, a la Canadian high school, it seems the drug and gang culture is stopping the ringleaders from becoming outstanding pillars of society. Otherwise, delinquents are more social, I suppose, but in an education system with such diverse learning that doesn’t exactly mean they’re inclined to more out-of-the-box thinking. The trust system has generated a consensus of kindness here; that oppressive notion of eventual competition isn’t as present as it was in HK, and I believe competition has much to do with it – but man, that’s another can of worms entirely.
Anyhow, thanks for letting me do that, I feel a bit better now. I’ve still only scratched the surface of this comparison, though. I didn’t want to leave another post in your comments section – then again, it broke your 500-word rule, so I pretty much already did >.<
May 16, 2010 at 12:34 am
I don’t mind at all if other people break the 500 word rule. If you need to get it out, by all means, be my guest.
I’m happy that the subject gets you passionate.
And that was all very interesting, too! I have a special fascination with Hong Kong and the other “international” cities of China, for reasons I can’t really pin down. But you’re right, city life makes you a bit harder no matter where you are.
Ningyo, just to be sure– you are a university student, aren’t you?
May 16, 2010 at 6:34 am
While yes, I do agree that Japanese Bancho may be more suited to deal with real-life situations than your average Japanese student, I also think that the same Bancho that in a Japanese teaching environment would talk and interact with the teacher, would be nothing besides useless idiots in other countries. I can say this with confidence because I’ve lived in three different countries with three different school systems in which one of the above situations happens.
When I was in Brazil, most people hated school and their teachers, and the ones who spoke to the teachers were the good kids like me who got excellent grades and enjoyed classes. I’d like to point out that absolutely no cramming, studying, or even doing homework was required to get good grades, you only had to pay attention in class. Here, bad kids were just idiots who were wasting their parents money and trying to ruin other people’s life because they were dumb.
On the other hand in Italy, where the school system relies heavily on cramming large amounts of information, the bancho’s friends were the ones who interacted with teachers. I was a good kid there too, but as much as I liked the teachers and had things I wanted to discuss with them, I never brought myself to do it because I felt the obligation to go study and talking to them reminded me that I had to do their homework or they’d be disappointed at me. Bad kids there were nice people who sometimes had insightful comments on one or two topics, but just weren’t dedicated.
Now I live in Canada and I study in one of the best schools in the country with the biggest gifted program in Ontario, so my experience here is probably not reflective of the Canadian school system. Anyway, here there are many different teachers with different teaching styles and so I have noticed both situations happen here. In some classes where all you need to do is pay attention(World Issues, some english classes, chemistry, physics) the good kids are always the more active ones, and on other classses where you actually have to do homework(some math classes, mostly english and social sciences, biology) the bad kids are the more active ones.
So here is my theory: bad kids hate compromises, so they consequentially hate school and don’t pay attention to classes and don’t do homework; good kids like school, so they pay attention to classes but still find that homework is a (extremely) boring task. In classes where people are supposed to do homework the ones who want good marks focus on their homework and on learning what they have to, but they don’t think about what they are learning and instead just memorize, so they are unable to come up with any discussion points. The bad kids who don’t care about homework don’t feel obligated to learn anything and they are able to think about something they heard and ask questions. This scene is inverted in classes that don’t have homework, where the ones with good marks think analytically about what they’re learning and ask all the questions and get involved with the teacher in order to acquire more knowledge that might be useful to them in a test or a quiz later. The bad kids on the other hand, don’t talk to their teachers because the good kids are always talking to them.
In conclusion, one might say that good kids are driven by the desire to learn and be successful in life through all the means possible to them, while bad kids just pick up random bits on information that they find curious enough to discuss with others. And this is why I think bad kids may succeed in one country but utterly fail in another: in a country that requires only one set of skills and information, the bancho makes himself distinguishable by knowing more that what he has to, and in a country that prefers a people with a wider set of skills, the bancho will fail to impress since while he may excel in one area or ability, he lacks basic knowledge that everyone should have.
Wow. This is bigger than most of my english essays/papers. I’m sorry for the extremely lengthy comment, I just felt that I had to write something in response to this post. That’s exactly why I like your blog though. The way you openly end your posts just gives room for so much discussion.
May 18, 2010 at 11:44 am
Ahh! Sorry! I didn’t ignore this, I just read it and forgot that I hadn’t commented.
It sounds like you’ve had quite the international upbringing, so I’d say you have a better leg to stand on when talking about this. And it’s true; the bancho might have the qualities that would be good for society, properly channeled, but unfortunately I don’t think Japanese society has the right institutions to properly channel it. Alas.
Thanks for reading. And for the lovely comment, too! Welcome.
May 21, 2010 at 2:20 pm
[...] me and I was kind of stuck with slacker nerds. I was 13, and I totally overcompensated by going Bancho which shocked everyone who knew me so far and climbed to the top of the gangs of delinquents by the [...]
June 21, 2010 at 9:47 pm
> This bounty hunter is my kind of scum: fearless and inventive!
July 12, 2010 at 8:22 pm
[...] around individuality within a strict and homogenising education system and has been explored by others through symptoms such as gangs and fashion groups. This idea unfortunately falls flat in [...]
October 23, 2010 at 5:42 pm
I like the way you think. May I have permission to add you to my blog roll?
October 23, 2010 at 10:57 pm
You hardly even need to ask.
It’s a pleasure!
December 9, 2010 at 12:20 pm
[...] is the “bad” student (a topic I’ve covered before in some detail). Aside from some stereotypical phrases (e.g. “YEAH OK ALL RIGHT LET’S GO”), she refuses [...]